<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" > <channel> <title>Sirened &#187; Voting</title> <atom:link href="http://www.sirened.com/category/voting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /> <link>http://www.sirened.com</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:50:49 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item> <title>Racist Whites With No Teeth Propel Hillary in PA Win</title> <link>http://www.sirened.com/2008/04/racist-whites-with-no-teeth-propel-hillary-in-pa-win/</link> <comments>http://www.sirened.com/2008/04/racist-whites-with-no-teeth-propel-hillary-in-pa-win/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:18:41 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator></dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Presidential Race]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Voting]]></category> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sirened.com/racist-whites-with-no-teeth-propel-hillary-in-pa-win</guid> <description><![CDATA[Last night after the dust settled in a critical battleground state come November, Hillary came away with a 10 point victory, 55%-45%. She proudly took the stage with husband &#8216;Slick Willy&#8217; and daughter Chelsea and thanked the people of PA for their gracious support. And it was indeed gracious of Pennsylvania voters to ignore the fact that Hillary is so obviously full of shit. Hillary once again mentioned her Pennsylvania roots, making it awfully tricky to keep up as she seems to have roots in about 5 different states. Coincidentally, husband Bill has spread roots in more states but that information [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sirened.com">Sirened</a></p> ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night after the dust settled in a critical battleground state come November, Hillary came away with a 10 point victory, 55%-45%. She proudly took the stage with husband &#8216;Slick Willy&#8217; and daughter Chelsea and thanked the people of PA for their gracious support. And it was indeed gracious of Pennsylvania voters to ignore the fact that Hillary is so obviously full of shit.</p> <p>Hillary once again mentioned her Pennsylvania roots, making it awfully tricky to keep up as she seems to have roots in about 5 different states. Coincidentally, husband Bill has <em>spread </em>roots in more states but that information is not public.</p> <p>So what made the difference in Pennsylvania? Racist white voters, particularly <em>old</em> racist white voters, the kind who were around when Barack would still have to use a separate water fountain to them. Obama outspent Clinton by 3-1 in Pennsylvania and that might not have been a good thing in that state. Many rural voters must have scratched their heads wondering why the colored fella&#8217; kept comin&#8217; on the TV to talk about running their country.</p> <p>Last night the talking heads discussed far too many demographics that were important to both candidates, but there was a critical one for Hillary that was not discussed-voters with no teeth. This demographic heavily favored Clinton; as the ratio of teeth declined so did the probability that they voted for Hillary. Hillary has made no announcement of any thank you dental plans for these PA voters but perhaps she should consider it as Kentucky is just around the corner.</p> <p>Meanwhile, latte sipping democratic elitists will get up from their golden toilets to flood Obama with more cash to continue fighting the pauper wing of the democratic party. Come on celebrities, there has to be even more of you waiting to come out of the woodwork to support Barack&#8217;s plan to turn the United States into France. <em>Libertie, Egalitie, Fraternitie </em>I say! Now that&#8217;s change I can believe in.</p> <p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sirened.com">Sirened</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.sirened.com/2008/04/racist-whites-with-no-teeth-propel-hillary-in-pa-win/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> <item> <title>Pennsylvania Set to Deliver Its &#8220;Bitter&#8221; Message of Despair</title> <link>http://www.sirened.com/2008/04/pennsylvania-set-to-deliver-its-bitter-message-of-despair/</link> <comments>http://www.sirened.com/2008/04/pennsylvania-set-to-deliver-its-bitter-message-of-despair/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:57:55 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator></dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Voting]]></category> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sirened.com/pennsylvania-set-to-deliver-its-bitter-message-of-despair</guid> <description><![CDATA[In just a few hours the polls will close in Pennsylvania and the people of that state will give us their glum vision of the future-I presume something along the lines of Terminator or Planet of the Apes. Whether the world will be taken over by machines or hairy primates is anyones guess, but the people of Pennsylvania are currently weighing in on that very question. Well, not exactly, but it seems firmly established that they are bitter and hopeless. How many people in the state really are, in fact bitter? Is the bitterness so pervasive that they can actually [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sirened.com">Sirened</a></p> ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In just a few hours the polls will close in Pennsylvania and the people of that state will give us their glum vision of the future-I presume something along the lines of <em>Terminator</em> or <em>Planet of the Apes</em>. Whether the world will be taken over by machines or hairy primates is anyones guess, but the people of Pennsylvania are currently weighing in on that very question. Well, not exactly, but it seems firmly established that they are bitter and hopeless. </p> <p>How many people in the state really are, in fact bitter? Is the bitterness so pervasive that they can actually taste it each day when they go to their miserable jobs, deal with their ungrateful children and have to talk with their boring spouses? Does it taste something like a flat Old Milwaukee that just won&#8217;t stop repeating? Or like that rusty nail you just can&#8217;t resist licking?</p> <p>There are many bitter and hopeless questions that Pennsylvanians are pondering at this very moment, as they decide between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. Will clean drinking water be restored? Will the malaria end? And when will Red Cross aid workers stop getting shot by Philadelphia insurgents? </p> <p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/8s3vbklTXd0"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/8s3vbklTXd0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p> <p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sirened.com">Sirened</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.sirened.com/2008/04/pennsylvania-set-to-deliver-its-bitter-message-of-despair/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> <item> <title>Around the Internets&#8230;Super Tuesday</title> <link>http://www.sirened.com/2008/02/around-the-internetssuper-tuesday/</link> <comments>http://www.sirened.com/2008/02/around-the-internetssuper-tuesday/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 23:28:21 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator></dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Presidential Race]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Voting]]></category> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sirened.com/around-the-internetssuper-tuesday</guid> <description><![CDATA[ Mike Huckabee wins wild West Virginia Convention  [Welcome to Pottersville]   What&#8217;s with all the conservative bashing of John McCain? [Crooks and Liars]          Will California determine the democratic nominee?  [Huffington Post]          Fun pic of John Kerry lounging with John McCain [RedState] Georgia&#8217;s dead primary precinct [Wonkette]       Rush Limbaugh continues his war on McCain [Drudge Report] Alabama turning blue?!? [Daily Kos]             Shocked monkey from this joint. Post from: Sirened <p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sirened.com">Sirened</a></p> ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://animals.nationalgeographic.com/staticfiles/NGS/Shared/StaticFiles/animals/images/primary/black-spider-monkey.jpg" border="0" align="left" width="300" alt="Monkey" height="225" /> Mike Huckabee wins wild West Virginia Convention <a href="http://welcome-to-pottersville.blogspot.com/"></a><a href="http://welcome-to-pottersville.blogspot.com/"> </a><a href="http://welcome-to-pottersville.blogspot.com/"> </a><a href="http://welcome-to-pottersville.blogspot.com/"> </a><a href="http://welcome-to-pottersville.blogspot.com/"> </a><a href="http://welcome-to-pottersville.blogspot.com/"> </a><a href="http://welcome-to-pottersville.blogspot.com/"> <p style="display: inline !important">[Welcome to Pottersville]</p> <p></a>  <p style="display: inline !important">What&#8217;s with all the conservative bashing of John McCain? <a href="http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/02/05/bill-oreilly-says-that-the-media-will-cut-mccains-throat/">[Crooks and Liars]</a></p> <p style="display: inline !important"> </p> <p style="display: inline !important"> </p> <p style="display: inline !important"> </p> <p>   <p style="display: inline !important">Will California determine the democratic nominee? </p> <p style="display: inline !important"><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/marc-cooper/the-battle-for-california_b_85119.html">[Huffington Post]</a></p> <p style="display: inline !important"><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/marc-cooper/the-battle-for-california_b_85119.html"></a> </p> <p style="display: inline !important"> </p> <p style="display: inline !important"> </p> <p style="display: inline !important"> </p> <p> Fun pic of John Kerry lounging with John McCain <a href="http://redstate.com/stories/elections/2008/super_tuesday_afternoon_open_thread_ii">[RedState]</a> Georgia&#8217;s dead primary precinct <a href="http://wonkette.com/352986/georgias-dead-looking-for-change">[Wonkette] </a> <p style="display: inline !important"><a href="http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/02/05/bill-oreilly-says-that-the-media-will-cut-mccains-throat/"></a> </p> <p style="display: inline !important"> </p> <p> Rush Limbaugh continues his war on McCain <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/04/AR2008020402798_pf.html">[Drudge Report]</a> Alabama turning blue?!? <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/2/5/165814/5388/34/450491">[Daily Kos] </a>   <p style="display: inline !important"> </p> <p style="display: inline !important"> </p> <p style="display: inline !important"> </p> <p style="display: inline !important"> </p> <p> Shocked monkey from <a href="http://animals.nationalgeographic.com/staticfiles/NGS/Shared/StaticFiles/animals/images/primary/black-spider-monkey.jpg">this joint</a>.</p> <p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sirened.com">Sirened</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.sirened.com/2008/02/around-the-internetssuper-tuesday/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item> <title>What is a Delegate?</title> <link>http://www.sirened.com/2008/02/what-is-a-delegate/</link> <comments>http://www.sirened.com/2008/02/what-is-a-delegate/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 22:56:00 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator></dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Presidential Race]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Voting]]></category> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sirened.com/what-is-a-delegate</guid> <description><![CDATA[In light of the popularity of my what is a caucus? post that involved me using a picture of duck hunters to explain the process; I figured I would do something similar to explain the delegate process. Ultimately the respective democrat and republican nominees are not selected by the total number of citizens who actually voted for them, no that would be far too simple and democratic. They are chosen by delegates and each state is worth a certain number of delegates. On the republican side some states are winner take all while others divide their delegates based on the percentage of votes each candidate garners. But then there are the super [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sirened.com">Sirened</a></p> ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img align="left" width="300" src="http://lh3.google.com/DalyRAlan/RvQs_xzT2pI/AAAAAAAAAGU/S939EPW2xFk/duck%20hunters%201111008.JPG?imgmax=576" alt="What is a Delegate?" height="250" style="width: 300px; height: 250px" title="What is a Delegate?" />In light of the popularity of my <em><a href="http://www.sirened.com/what-is-a-caucus">what is a caucus?</a></em> post that involved me using a picture of duck hunters to explain the process; I figured I would do something similar to explain the <strong>delegate process</strong>.</p> <p>Ultimately the respective democrat and republican nominees are not selected by the total number of citizens who actually voted for them, no that would be far too simple and democratic. They are chosen by delegates and each state is worth a certain number of delegates. On the republican side some states are winner take all while others divide their delegates based on the percentage of votes each candidate garners. But then there are the super delegates like governors and other dignitaries who represent votes at the respective conventions where the nominees are chosen. Dizzy yet?</p> <p>For some, the delegate process might be confusing so let&#8217;s break this down as per the picture. Let&#8217;s say the front 3 hunters represent winner take all states, the back 2 represent split delegate states and the 2 dogs represent the super delegates (considering they don&#8217;t work and we have to pick up their shit they really are superior beings).</p> <p>In order to be <em>the</em> nominee at our actual conventions, for a democrat it takes <strong>2,025</strong> delegates and <strong>1,191</strong> for a republican (again, making the number of delegates here equal would be far too straightforward).</p> <p>That&#8217;s way too many for the above picture, so in my fictional scenario we&#8217;ll call this party the <em>demo-repub&#8217;s</em> and in order to win their nomination you need 4 out of 7 delegates. Again, to make this as simple as possible there are only two candidates vying for the <em>demo-repub</em> ticket. We&#8217;ll call these candidates Helen Omama and Matt McFry.</p> <p><span id="more-464"></span></p> <p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sirened.com">Sirened</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.sirened.com/2008/02/what-is-a-delegate/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>24</slash:comments> </item> <item> <title>Early Voting in Florida</title> <link>http://www.sirened.com/2008/01/early-voting-in-florida/</link> <comments>http://www.sirened.com/2008/01/early-voting-in-florida/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:23:47 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator></dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Presidential Race]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Voting]]></category> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sirened.com/early-voting-in-florida</guid> <description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re a Florida voter, chances are you have something in common with this man, you&#8217;re old and confused. Coincidentally, this man is also on the republican ballot and you can vote for him. He holds some belief about going back to the olden&#8217; days where people traded in gold rather than deflated US dollars. Anyways, both the democrats and republicans are holding primaries in Florida on January 29th. But if that date doesn&#8217;t suit you, you should consider voting early, which is what I did. As long as you&#8217;re in the county you are registered to vote in, you can swing by [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sirened.com">Sirened</a></p> ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="left"><img align="left" width="250" src="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/06/02/ron_paul/story.jpg" alt="Florida Voting, Ron Paul" height="300" style="width: 250px; height: 300px" title="Florida Voting, Ron Paul" />If you&#8217;re a Florida voter, chances are you have something in common with this man, you&#8217;re old and confused. Coincidentally, this man is also on the republican ballot and you can vote for him. He holds some belief about going back to the olden&#8217; days where people traded in gold rather than deflated US dollars.</p> <p align="left">Anyways, both the democrats and republicans are holding primaries in Florida on January 29th. But if that date doesn&#8217;t suit you, you should consider voting early, which is what I did.</p> <p align="left">As long as you&#8217;re in the county you are registered to vote in, you can swing by the public library with your driver&#8217;s license and they&#8217;ll give you your respective ballot. This was my first time doing the early voting thing (aside from casting an absentee ballot from overseas once) and I must say I was pleased with the process, especially with it being Florida and all.</p> <p align="left">I much preferred voting in the library to voting at the precinct on Election Day. First off, if you&#8217;re serious about voting, who knows what might happen on Election Day. What if your house burns down or you get kidnapped? Chances are you won&#8217;t get to vote and that&#8217;s a bummer. Then again, if you die before the election date, should your vote <em>really</em> count anyways? That&#8217;s some food for thought but beside the point.</p> <p align="left">Secondly, if voter turnout is high on January 29th, you may have to wait a decent bit at your precinct. That could mean missing out on the bus to Suncruz Casino. But with early voting the process is at your leisure and chances are you won&#8217;t have to wait (I didn&#8217;t). So get out there and do some early voting this weekend!</p> <p align="left">Crazy old guy (Ron Paul) image from <a href="http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/06/02/ron_paul/story.jpg&amp;imgrefurl=http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/06/02/ron_paul/&amp;h=350&amp;w=300&amp;sz=31&amp;hl=en&amp;start=18&amp;um=1&amp;tbnid=bmtAEv1fwkAQZM:&amp;tbnh=120&amp;tbnw=103&amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3D%2522ron%2Bpaul%2522%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DSUNA,SUNA:2005-50,SUNA:en">this joint</a>.</p> <p align="left">&nbsp;</p> <p align="left">&nbsp;</p> <p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sirened.com">Sirened</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.sirened.com/2008/01/early-voting-in-florida/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item> <title>Presidential Candidates Courting the Fat Vote</title> <link>http://www.sirened.com/2008/01/presidential-candidates-courting-the-fat-vote/</link> <comments>http://www.sirened.com/2008/01/presidential-candidates-courting-the-fat-vote/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:39:31 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator></dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Presidential Race]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Voting]]></category> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sirened.com/presidential-candidates-courting-the-fat-vote</guid> <description><![CDATA[As Obese Population Rises, More Candidates Courting The Fat Vote Here&#8217;s a fun video from The Onion. Since politicians and the media are so obsessed with targeting various segments of society-age, ethnicity, promiscuity, etc; The Onion takes a look at a very large segment of our population that the candidates are now going after: the obese vote. Who will garner the most fat votes and what are the candidates doing to capture the hearts and minds of the American obese? Post from: Sirened <p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sirened.com">Sirened</a></p> ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><embed src="http://www.theonion.com/content/themes/common/assets/videoplayer/flvplayer.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowScriptAccess="always" wmode="transparent" width="400" height="355" flashvars="file=http://www.theonion.com/content/xml/72752/video&#038;autostart=false&#038;image=http://www.theonion.com/content/files/images/FAT_VOTE_article.jpg&#038;bufferlength=3&#038;embedded=true&#038;title=As%20Obese%20Population%20Rises%2C%20More%20Candidates%20Courting%20The%20Fat%20Vote"></embed><br/><a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/video/as_obese_population_rises_more?utm_source=embedded_video">As Obese Population Rises, More Candidates Courting The Fat Vote</a></p> <p>Here&#8217;s a fun video from <em>The Onion</em>. Since politicians and the media are so obsessed with targeting various segments of society-age, ethnicity, promiscuity, etc; <em>The Onion </em>takes a look at a very large segment of our population that the candidates are now going after: the obese vote. Who will garner the most fat votes and what are the candidates doing to capture the hearts and minds of the American obese?</p> <p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sirened.com">Sirened</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.sirened.com/2008/01/presidential-candidates-courting-the-fat-vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item> <title>Caucus with the Family</title> <link>http://www.sirened.com/2008/01/caucus-with-the-family-2/</link> <comments>http://www.sirened.com/2008/01/caucus-with-the-family-2/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:12:06 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator></dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Living]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Voting]]></category> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sirened.com/caucus-with-the-family-2</guid> <description><![CDATA[This is a theme post for b5media&#8217;s Travel and Culture channel entitled &#8220;family.&#8221; So I decided to focus on the all important family caucus, which involves telling your family members why they are wrong and why they should vote with you. In almost all families there is some degree of political difference, some large and some small. When gathering a family caucus it is important to leave out members who have a vastly different political position, chances are you will be left spinning your wheels in mud. It&#8217;s best to focus on family members (and friends!) with smaller political differences to yours. A family caucus can [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sirened.com">Sirened</a></p> ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img align="left" width="300" src="http://imagecache2.allposters.com/images/pic/PF/PF_340151_OEM_15MB~Family-Ties-Posters.jpg" alt="Family Ties" height="350" style="width: 300px; height: 350px" title="Family Ties" />This is a theme post for b5media&#8217;s Travel and Culture channel entitled &#8220;family.&#8221; So I decided to focus on the all important family caucus, which involves telling your family members why they are wrong and why they should vote with you.</p> <p>In almost all families there is some degree of political difference, some large and some small. When gathering a family caucus it is important to leave out members who have a vastly different political position, chances are you will be left spinning your wheels in mud. It&#8217;s best to focus on family members (and friends!) with smaller political differences to yours. A family caucus can involve say, a family dinner or after church lunch. It can also involve individual meetings with family members, but however you do it; make a strong case as to why you are right and why they should vote along your lines.</p> <p>Family (and friends!) caucusing is a great way to get around that stupid notion that we all have just one vote. Not really! If you are successful with family caucusing you can essentially (and legally) vote 2, 3 or even 10 times! And with American elections being so close these days, the family caucus has <em>never</em> been more important than now.</p> <p><em>Family Ties</em> image from <a href="http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://imagecache2.allposters.com/images/pic/PF/PF_340151_OEM_15MB~Family-Ties-Posters.jpg&amp;imgrefurl=http://www.allposters.com/-sp/Family-Ties-Posters_i1575005_.htm&amp;h=403&amp;w=350&amp;sz=27&amp;hl=en&amp;start=17&amp;um=1&amp;tbnid=hnH8fK1n2EsOIM:&amp;tbnh=124&amp;tbnw=108&amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3D%2522family%2Bties%2522%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DSUNA,SUNA:2005-50,SUNA:en%26sa%3DN">allposters.com</a></p> <p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sirened.com">Sirened</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.sirened.com/2008/01/caucus-with-the-family-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>6</slash:comments> </item> <item> <title>Nevada Casino Caucuses!</title> <link>http://www.sirened.com/2008/01/nevada-casino-caucuses/</link> <comments>http://www.sirened.com/2008/01/nevada-casino-caucuses/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:31:11 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator></dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Presidential Race]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Voting]]></category> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sirened.com/nevada-casino-caucuses</guid> <description><![CDATA[If you thought the Iowa caucuses were exciting you ain&#8217;t seen nothin&#8217; yet! That&#8217;s right, the January 19th Nevada caucuses will include 9 Las Vegas strip casinos! And hey, it&#8217;s Vegas baby, why not? What would Nevada caucuses be without holding some in casinos? It&#8217;s nice to be able to place a wager on who will win the Nevada caucus and then have some control over the outcome by loudly and furiously caucusing for your candidate (actually you can&#8217;t legally wager on this in Nevada so either see your bookie or place your wager online before caucusing). The reason for the casino caucuses is to [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sirened.com">Sirened</a></p> ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img align="left" width="300" src="http://www.bonjourquebec.com/fileadmin/Image/decouvrez/activites/attraits/casinos/casino_g.jpg" alt="Casino" height="225" style="width: 300px; height: 225px" title="Casino" />If you thought the Iowa caucuses were exciting you ain&#8217;t seen nothin&#8217; yet! That&#8217;s right, the January 19th Nevada caucuses will include <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/17/casino.caucuses/index.html">9 Las Vegas strip casinos!</a></p> <p>And hey, it&#8217;s Vegas baby, why not? What would Nevada caucuses be without holding some in casinos? It&#8217;s nice to be able to place a wager on who will win the Nevada <a href="http://www.sirened.com/what-is-a-caucus">caucus</a> and then have some control over the outcome by loudly and furiously caucusing for your candidate (actually you can&#8217;t legally wager on this in Nevada so either see your bookie or place your wager online before caucusing).</p> <p>The reason for the casino caucuses is to make it easier for casino employees to have a say in the process. I think it&#8217;s fantastic that someone can work, gamble and vote all under the same roof. That&#8217;s America baby! I think next time they should hold caucuses in brothels as well though. Why should prostitutes be left out of the political process?</p> <p>The glitz and glamour of the casino from <a href="http://www.bonjourquebec.com/fileadmin/Image/decouvrez/activites/attraits/casinos/casino_g.jpg">this place</a>.</p> <p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sirened.com">Sirened</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.sirened.com/2008/01/nevada-casino-caucuses/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item> <title>Iowa Caucus Recap&#8230;Winners and Losers</title> <link>http://www.sirened.com/2008/01/iowa-caucus-recapwinners-and-losers/</link> <comments>http://www.sirened.com/2008/01/iowa-caucus-recapwinners-and-losers/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 22:32:30 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator></dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Presidential Race]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Voting]]></category> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sirened.com/iowa-caucus-recapwinners-and-losers</guid> <description><![CDATA[ The fraction of the 91% ethnically white Iowa has spoken and the winners are Barack Obama and Mike Huckabee. Hillary Clinton and Rudy Giuliani were the biggest losers considering they both had the worst case scenarios happen to them. Hillary finished 3rd amongst dems behind Obama and John Edwards and Rudy Giuliani finished 6th amongst republicans with 4% of the votes. Now I know Rudy Giuliani didn&#8217;t spend much energy on Iowa but 6th place?!? Are you kidding me? He finished behind Ron Paul! And Ron Paul didn&#8217;t just beat Rudolph; he crushed him with his 10%! Fred Thompson finished 3rd and why not considering he didn&#8217;t do [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sirened.com">Sirened</a></p> ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="425" src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2008/01/03/us/03caucus-8-511.jpg" alt="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2008/01/03/us/03caucus-8-511.jpg" height="225" style="width: 425px; height: 225px" title="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2008/01/03/us/03caucus-8-511.jpg" /></p> <p>The fraction of the 91% ethnically white Iowa has spoken and the winners are Barack Obama and Mike Huckabee. Hillary Clinton and Rudy Giuliani were the biggest losers considering they both had the worst case scenarios happen to them. Hillary finished 3rd amongst dems behind Obama and John Edwards and Rudy Giuliani finished <em>6th</em> amongst republicans with <em>4%</em> of the votes.</p> <p>Now I know Rudy Giuliani didn&#8217;t spend much energy on Iowa but 6th place?!? Are you kidding me? He finished behind Ron Paul! And Ron Paul didn&#8217;t just beat Rudolph; he crushed him with his 10%!</p> <p>Fred Thompson finished 3rd and why not considering he didn&#8217;t do much. Mitt Romney did himself a disservice by doing <em>too</em> much; he massively out spent Huckabee and finished second. During the caucuses I was watching CNN&#8217;s coverage and Anderson Cooper said that it seems the more that people get to know Mitt Romney the more they seem to dislike him.</p> <p>The same can certainly be said for Hillary Clinton. If Hillary didn&#8217;t stop into so many diners in Iowa, perhaps she would have won the caucus. All it takes is pissing off a few Iowa diners and that&#8217;s it, presidential campaign down the toilet!</p> <p>Iowa is made up of about 3 million people but only about 350,000 people actually caucused. And not 350,000 on each side, that&#8217;s the <em>total</em> <em>amount</em> that caucused. So let&#8217;s be clear, it&#8217;s not Iowa that&#8217;s crucial to our presidential elections, it&#8217;s actually about <strong>12% of Iowa!</strong></p> <p>Image from the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/03/us/politics/03cnd-campaign.html?hp">NY Times</a>.</p> <p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sirened.com">Sirened</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.sirened.com/2008/01/iowa-caucus-recapwinners-and-losers/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> <item> <title>Iowa/New Hampshire Polls Changing by the Second!</title> <link>http://www.sirened.com/2008/01/iowanew-hampshire-polls-changing-by-the-second/</link> <comments>http://www.sirened.com/2008/01/iowanew-hampshire-polls-changing-by-the-second/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 04:45:54 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator></dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Voting]]></category> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sirened.com/iowanew-hampshire-polls-changing-by-the-second</guid> <description><![CDATA[John McCain is tied with Mitt Romney for the lead in New Hampshire!? Huh? When did the media decide that John McCain still had a chance to be president? Isn&#8217;t the point of polls to predetermine the eventual winner of the respective nominations? How are people supposed to decide who to vote for if they don&#8217;t already know who everybody else is voting for? I&#8217;ve said this before on this site-I don&#8217;t want to vote for a loser! I want to have bragging rights amongst friends that I voted for the eventual winner. But right now, I don&#8217;t have a clue! This [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sirened.com">Sirened</a></p> ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="left"><img align="left" width="300" src="http://www.onthetable.co.uk/db/themephoto/Clocks.jpg" alt="Clock" height="225" style="width: 300px; height: 225px" title="Clock" />John McCain is tied with Mitt Romney for the lead in New Hampshire!? Huh? When did the media decide that John McCain still had a chance to be president?</p> <p>Isn&#8217;t the point of polls to predetermine the eventual winner of the respective nominations? How are people supposed to decide who to vote for if they don&#8217;t already know who everybody else is voting for? I&#8217;ve said this before on this site-I don&#8217;t want to vote for a loser!</p> <p>I want to have bragging rights amongst friends that I voted for the eventual winner. But right now, I don&#8217;t have a clue! This election hasn&#8217;t even started yet and apparently people will be voting!</p> <p>Thank goodness I don&#8217;t live in Iowa because it would be super humiliating to caucus for the eventual loser and have all my friends see me doing this firsthand. I would only hope that I knew some embarrassing and/or destructive secret about them so they&#8217;d keep their mouths shut; perhaps an STD or a marital affair with a sheep. I don&#8217;t know, I&#8217;m just brainstorming here.</p> <p>Fortunately, I live in Florida so I will allow the good people of Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina to vote for me. After these 3 states decide, my vote will just be a formality and I will simply go through the motions and leave with my head held high. Yay democracy! And if something really screwy happens, I can always just lie.</p> <p>Trippy clock image from <a href="http://www.onthetable.co.uk/db/themephoto/Clocks.jpg">this joint</a>.</p> <p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sirened.com">Sirened</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.sirened.com/2008/01/iowanew-hampshire-polls-changing-by-the-second/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
